<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1842 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290047</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 2,23,10,000/- under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act, citing tangible evidence such as bank statements, the agreement, and sale deeds corroborating the unexplained cash payment. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the assessee&#039;s failure to cross-examine witnesses and the corroborative evidence presented by the Assessing Officer. The decision was pronounced in open court on 09/10/2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2020 22:56:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1842 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290047</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 2,23,10,000/- under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act, citing tangible evidence such as bank statements, the agreement, and sale deeds corroborating the unexplained cash payment. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the assessee&#039;s failure to cross-examine witnesses and the corroborative evidence presented by the Assessing Officer. The decision was pronounced in open court on 09/10/2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>