https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398094 The court directed the petitioner to submit a representation to the appropriate authority regarding the non-reimbursement of the differential tax amount due to the transition from VAT to GST in works contracts. The authority was instructed to consider and dispose of the representation based on revised guidelines within a specified timeframe. The petitioner retained the right to challenge the authority's decision if dissatisfied, with no coercive action allowed until the specified date. The writ petition and related cases were disposed of, and the court permitted the use of the soft copy of the order during the COVID-19 lockdown. en-us Wed, 02 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Sep 2020 22:52:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398094 The court directed the petitioner to submit a representation to the appropriate authority regarding the non-reimbursement of the differential tax amount due to the transition from VAT to GST in works contracts. The authority was instructed to consider and dispose of the representation based on revised guidelines within a specified timeframe. The petitioner retained the right to challenge the authority's decision if dissatisfied, with no coercive action allowed until the specified date. The writ petition and related cases were disposed of, and the court permitted the use of the soft copy of the order during the COVID-19 lockdown. Case-Laws GST Wed, 02 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398094