<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 212 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398093</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Mobile Squad, Mughal Sarai, Chandauli, citing the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 107 of the G.S.T. Act. The petitioner was directed to appeal to the Appellate Authority within three months. The Court emphasized the need for the appellate authority to promptly decide on the appeal and any stay application in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2020 22:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 212 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398093</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Mobile Squad, Mughal Sarai, Chandauli, citing the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 107 of the G.S.T. Act. The petitioner was directed to appeal to the Appellate Authority within three months. The Court emphasized the need for the appellate authority to promptly decide on the appeal and any stay application in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>