<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 201 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398082</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the petition, setting aside the non-speaking orders that demanded a 20% deposit under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Authority was directed to issue a fresh order within 15 days, considering the petitioner&#039;s application and adhering to the Guidelines for Staying Demand, specifically Clause (C)(v). Compliance was to be ensured by communicating the fresh order via email to the parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2020 22:38:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 201 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398082</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the petition, setting aside the non-speaking orders that demanded a 20% deposit under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Authority was directed to issue a fresh order within 15 days, considering the petitioner&#039;s application and adhering to the Guidelines for Staying Demand, specifically Clause (C)(v). Compliance was to be ensured by communicating the fresh order via email to the parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>