<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 190 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398071</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer lacked authority to charge late fees under section 234E for periods before 01.06.2015, even if TDS returns were filed or processed after that date. The amendment to section 200A(1)(c) was deemed prospective, rendering any intimation or rectification order imposing fees for earlier periods invalid. As a result, the appeals were successful, and the fees assessed under section 234E were removed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2020 22:26:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 190 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398071</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer lacked authority to charge late fees under section 234E for periods before 01.06.2015, even if TDS returns were filed or processed after that date. The amendment to section 200A(1)(c) was deemed prospective, rendering any intimation or rectification order imposing fees for earlier periods invalid. As a result, the appeals were successful, and the fees assessed under section 234E were removed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>