<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 189 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398070</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was not justified in confirming the late fee levied under Section 234E by the Assessing Officer for periods before 01.06.2015. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the fee and interest levied under Section 220(2), allowing the appeals filed by the assessee based on the principle of favoring the assessee in cases of conflicting judicial decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2020 22:26:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 189 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398070</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was not justified in confirming the late fee levied under Section 234E by the Assessing Officer for periods before 01.06.2015. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the fee and interest levied under Section 220(2), allowing the appeals filed by the assessee based on the principle of favoring the assessee in cases of conflicting judicial decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>