<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 184 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398065</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai remitted the issue of treating opening work-in-progress as a business loss back to the Assessing Officer for re-evaluation. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a detailed examination of the assessee&#039;s submissions and granted the assessee an opportunity to present their case. The delay in the pronouncement was attributed to the Covid-19 lockdown. The appeal by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes on 16th July 2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2020 22:09:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 184 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398065</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai remitted the issue of treating opening work-in-progress as a business loss back to the Assessing Officer for re-evaluation. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a detailed examination of the assessee&#039;s submissions and granted the assessee an opportunity to present their case. The delay in the pronouncement was attributed to the Covid-19 lockdown. The appeal by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes on 16th July 2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>