<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 1049 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290039</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s interim order staying the termination of service of respondents, noting the error in granting such relief prematurely. The Court directed the High Court to decide the writ petition within three months, without delving into the appeal&#039;s merits. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs, emphasizing the High Court&#039;s role in examining the appeal&#039;s merits during the writ petition&#039;s disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2020 15:05:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 1049 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290039</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s interim order staying the termination of service of respondents, noting the error in granting such relief prematurely. The Court directed the High Court to decide the writ petition within three months, without delving into the appeal&#039;s merits. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs, emphasizing the High Court&#039;s role in examining the appeal&#039;s merits during the writ petition&#039;s disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>