https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398054 The judgment concluded that the civil court lacked jurisdiction over the dispute post the incorporation of Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013. It emphasized that matters falling under the Companies Act, 2013, should be addressed by the Company Law Tribunal. The issuance of duplicate share certificates dispute was deemed to be within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Tribunal, as mandated by Section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013. The civil court's order was set aside, directing the matter to be presented before the Company Law Tribunal for resolution. en-us Mon, 11 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Sep 2020 12:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398054 The judgment concluded that the civil court lacked jurisdiction over the dispute post the incorporation of Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013. It emphasized that matters falling under the Companies Act, 2013, should be addressed by the Company Law Tribunal. The issuance of duplicate share certificates dispute was deemed to be within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Tribunal, as mandated by Section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013. The civil court's order was set aside, directing the matter to be presented before the Company Law Tribunal for resolution. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 11 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398054