<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 170 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398051</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition as it had become infructuous. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn, and any interlocutory application was also disposed of. The judgment did not delve into the merits of the case due to the withdrawal of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2020 10:46:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 170 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398051</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition as it had become infructuous. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn, and any interlocutory application was also disposed of. The judgment did not delve into the merits of the case due to the withdrawal of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>