<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 170 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398051</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenged the State&#039;s withdrawal of sales tax exemption benefits promised under the Industrial Policy Resolution, 1995 and questioned provisions of the Bihar VAT Act, 2005 and related rules as arbitrary, discriminatory, retrospective and inconsistent with promissory estoppel. The petitioner also sought continuation of exemption for the unavailed period and restraint against tax demands during the exemption period. Counsel then sought permission to withdraw the petition as it had become infructuous, and the Court granted permission. The writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn, and all interlocutory applications were also disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2020 10:46:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 170 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398051</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenged the State&#039;s withdrawal of sales tax exemption benefits promised under the Industrial Policy Resolution, 1995 and questioned provisions of the Bihar VAT Act, 2005 and related rules as arbitrary, discriminatory, retrospective and inconsistent with promissory estoppel. The petitioner also sought continuation of exemption for the unavailed period and restraint against tax demands during the exemption period. Counsel then sought permission to withdraw the petition as it had become infructuous, and the Court granted permission. The writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn, and all interlocutory applications were also disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>