https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398050 A writ court ordinarily need not interfere with a show cause notice initiating reassessment under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003, and interference was declined at that stage. However, considering the pandemic-related ies and the petitioner's stated inability to obtain supporting railway records, additional time was granted to file a reply with documents. The authority was directed to consider the reply, afford a personal hearing, and decide the matter in accordance with law, with liberty to drop the proceedings if the disputed tax had already been remitted and such course was legally permissible. en-us Wed, 26 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Sep 2020 10:46:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398050 A writ court ordinarily need not interfere with a show cause notice initiating reassessment under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003, and interference was declined at that stage. However, considering the pandemic-related ies and the petitioner's stated inability to obtain supporting railway records, additional time was granted to file a reply with documents. The authority was directed to consider the reply, afford a personal hearing, and decide the matter in accordance with law, with liberty to drop the proceedings if the disputed tax had already been remitted and such course was legally permissible. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 26 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398050