https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23149 Under SAFEMA, a notice under section 6(1) is valid where the Competent Authority has recorded reasons to believe that property is illegally acquired; non-supply of those reasons does not vitiate proceedings absent material prejudice. Section 6(2) service is required only when the notice itself states that property is held by another person on the noticee's behalf, and use of English in the notice is valid if the noticee responds to it. Non-supply of the detention order under COFEPOSA does not defeat forfeiture proceedings unless the detention's legality is challenged. Property is liable to forfeiture when lawful sources for acquisition are not proved. en-us Tue, 07 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:05:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23149 Under SAFEMA, a notice under section 6(1) is valid where the Competent Authority has recorded reasons to believe that property is illegally acquired; non-supply of those reasons does not vitiate proceedings absent material prejudice. Section 6(2) service is required only when the notice itself states that property is held by another person on the noticee's behalf, and use of English in the notice is valid if the noticee responds to it. Non-supply of the detention order under COFEPOSA does not defeat forfeiture proceedings unless the detention's legality is challenged. Property is liable to forfeiture when lawful sources for acquisition are not proved. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 07 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23149