<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (12) TMI 14 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23148</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay did not answer the first question referred by the Tribunal but ruled in favor of the Revenue by answering the second question in the negative. The court relied on a previous Full Bench judgment to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:04:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (12) TMI 14 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23148</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay did not answer the first question referred by the Tribunal but ruled in favor of the Revenue by answering the second question in the negative. The court relied on a previous Full Bench judgment to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>