<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 143 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398024</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer could not impose late fees under section 234E for TDS statements filed before 01.06.2015, as the amendment to section 200A(1)(c) was prospective. Relying on prior High Court decisions, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees, invalidating the late fee charges and allowing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 17:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 143 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398024</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer could not impose late fees under section 234E for TDS statements filed before 01.06.2015, as the amendment to section 200A(1)(c) was prospective. Relying on prior High Court decisions, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees, invalidating the late fee charges and allowing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>