<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessee&#039;s Request to Delete Expense Addition Rejected; Must Follow Legal Principles Over Tax Timing Discrepancy.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54616</link>
    <description>Disallowance on account of provision for expenses - The alternative request of the assessee to delete the addition on the ground that the assessee has offered the same for tax in subsequent assessment year, is also rejected because the issue in dispute is to be decided in accordance with law and not according to the choice of the assessee when he offer for tax. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2020 18:14:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2020 18:14:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessee&#039;s Request to Delete Expense Addition Rejected; Must Follow Legal Principles Over Tax Timing Discrepancy.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54616</link>
      <description>Disallowance on account of provision for expenses - The alternative request of the assessee to delete the addition on the ground that the assessee has offered the same for tax in subsequent assessment year, is also rejected because the issue in dispute is to be decided in accordance with law and not according to the choice of the assessee when he offer for tax. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2020 18:14:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>