https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398019 The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the decision to release the goods to the second respondent. The judge found that the petitioner did not make payments to the foreign exporter or the second respondent, and the original documents were in the possession of the second respondent. Emphasizing the perishable nature of the goods, the judge ruled that retaining them would be futile, leading to loss. The judge concluded that the Customs authorities were not concerned with the petitioner's civil claims against the foreign exporter, ultimately allowing the release of the goods to the second respondent. en-us Fri, 28 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Nov 2020 12:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398019 The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the decision to release the goods to the second respondent. The judge found that the petitioner did not make payments to the foreign exporter or the second respondent, and the original documents were in the possession of the second respondent. Emphasizing the perishable nature of the goods, the judge ruled that retaining them would be futile, leading to loss. The judge concluded that the Customs authorities were not concerned with the petitioner's civil claims against the foreign exporter, ultimately allowing the release of the goods to the second respondent. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 28 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398019