https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398012 The court found that the inquiry and the Registrar of Companies' report complied with Section 206(4) of the Companies Act, 2013. The Central Government's decision to order an investigation under Section 212(1)(a) and (c) was deemed valid based on prima facie circumstances and public interest. The court dismissed the writ petitions, upholding the impugned order dated 27.02.2020, allowing the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) to proceed with the investigation. The court emphasized that its ruling pertained to jurisdictional matters and did not delve into the merits of the allegations pending investigation. en-us Wed, 26 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Sep 2020 17:40:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398012 The court found that the inquiry and the Registrar of Companies' report complied with Section 206(4) of the Companies Act, 2013. The Central Government's decision to order an investigation under Section 212(1)(a) and (c) was deemed valid based on prima facie circumstances and public interest. The court dismissed the writ petitions, upholding the impugned order dated 27.02.2020, allowing the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) to proceed with the investigation. The court emphasized that its ruling pertained to jurisdictional matters and did not delve into the merits of the allegations pending investigation. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 26 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398012