<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 111 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397992</link>
    <description>Interim bail was granted on a combination of custody-related and practical factors: the petitioner had spent more than two years in custody, had family support and a permanent residence in Goa, and gave an affidavit undertaking to attend trial dates and participate through video conferencing. The Court treated the jail pandemic situation as a serious concern, while the medical report showed only a mild skin allergy with improvement and stable vitals. It also noted satisfactory jail conduct, no other pending cases, and the absence of two independent witnesses at the alleged seizure. Release was ordered for 45 days on conditions ensuring attendance and non-interference with the trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2020 11:13:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 111 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397992</link>
      <description>Interim bail was granted on a combination of custody-related and practical factors: the petitioner had spent more than two years in custody, had family support and a permanent residence in Goa, and gave an affidavit undertaking to attend trial dates and participate through video conferencing. The Court treated the jail pandemic situation as a serious concern, while the medical report showed only a mild skin allergy with improvement and stable vitals. It also noted satisfactory jail conduct, no other pending cases, and the absence of two independent witnesses at the alleged seizure. Release was ordered for 45 days on conditions ensuring attendance and non-interference with the trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>