https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397984 In a prosecution under the Negotiable Instruments Act, affidavit evidence of the complainant may be tested by cross-examination when the accused applies under Section 145(2). The High Court noted that the record did not show the case was being tried as a summary trial and no material was produced to establish absence of a probable defence. In those circumstances, the request to recall the complainant for cross-examination was not unjustified, and no jurisdictional or legal error was shown in the order allowing recall. Interference in inherent jurisdiction was therefore not warranted, and the petition was rejected. en-us Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Sep 2020 10:59:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397984 In a prosecution under the Negotiable Instruments Act, affidavit evidence of the complainant may be tested by cross-examination when the accused applies under Section 145(2). The High Court noted that the record did not show the case was being tried as a summary trial and no material was produced to establish absence of a probable defence. In those circumstances, the request to recall the complainant for cross-examination was not unjustified, and no jurisdictional or legal error was shown in the order allowing recall. Interference in inherent jurisdiction was therefore not warranted, and the petition was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397984