https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290012 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the manufacturers, setting aside the recovery order for Central Excise duty due to insufficient evidence. It emphasized the necessity for concrete evidence, such as excess production details and transportation records, to substantiate allegations of clandestine removal. The appeals were allowed, underscoring the importance of thorough investigations and corroborative evidence in such cases. en-us Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Nov 2024 11:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290012 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the manufacturers, setting aside the recovery order for Central Excise duty due to insufficient evidence. It emphasized the necessity for concrete evidence, such as excess production details and transportation records, to substantiate allegations of clandestine removal. The appeals were allowed, underscoring the importance of thorough investigations and corroborative evidence in such cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290012