<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1673 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290009</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the actions complained of, including changing the mandate for operating bank accounts, lack of proportionate representation on the board, alleged unauthorized construction on government land, and writing off bad debts, did not amount to oppression or mismanagement. As a result, Company Petition No. 17 of 2017 was dismissed, interim orders were vacated, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2020 10:45:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1673 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290009</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the actions complained of, including changing the mandate for operating bank accounts, lack of proportionate representation on the board, alleged unauthorized construction on government land, and writing off bad debts, did not amount to oppression or mismanagement. As a result, Company Petition No. 17 of 2017 was dismissed, interim orders were vacated, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>