https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290017 Under the Anti-Dumping Rules, the High Court considered whether the existing designated authority should continue with the exercise ordered on remand despite a credible apprehension against that officer. It held that, in the circumstances, continuation by the same authority was inappropriate and that other officers of the requisite rank were available to perform the task. The Union of India was therefore directed to appoint another competent officer as the designated authority and complete the remand exercise expeditiously within two weeks. en-us Mon, 05 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Sep 2020 10:45:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290017 Under the Anti-Dumping Rules, the High Court considered whether the existing designated authority should continue with the exercise ordered on remand despite a credible apprehension against that officer. It held that, in the circumstances, continuation by the same authority was inappropriate and that other officers of the requisite rank were available to perform the task. The Union of India was therefore directed to appoint another competent officer as the designated authority and complete the remand exercise expeditiously within two weeks. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 05 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290017