<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1325 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290019</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondents to proceed with the enquiry under Section 206(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, against the petitioner, considering the explanation submitted by the petitioner and concluding the enquiry within six months from the date of the court order. The court emphasized the importance of promptly concluding the enquiry and did not impose any costs on the parties involved, instructing the closure of any pending miscellaneous petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2020 10:45:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1325 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290019</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondents to proceed with the enquiry under Section 206(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, against the petitioner, considering the explanation submitted by the petitioner and concluding the enquiry within six months from the date of the court order. The court emphasized the importance of promptly concluding the enquiry and did not impose any costs on the parties involved, instructing the closure of any pending miscellaneous petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>