<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 93 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397974</link>
    <description>The court vacated Ext.P5 order due to lack of opportunity for the petitioner to be heard and improper application of mind. The court directed the Authority to reassess the stay petition, set aside Ext.P5, and instructed the 2nd respondent to review the stay application after granting the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. Recovery actions were deferred until the stay application was reconsidered, and hearing options were specified to accommodate COVID-19 restrictions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 10:07:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 93 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397974</link>
      <description>The court vacated Ext.P5 order due to lack of opportunity for the petitioner to be heard and improper application of mind. The court directed the Authority to reassess the stay petition, set aside Ext.P5, and instructed the 2nd respondent to review the stay application after granting the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. Recovery actions were deferred until the stay application was reconsidered, and hearing options were specified to accommodate COVID-19 restrictions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>