<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (12) TMI 16 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23132</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta dismissed a writ petition challenging the proclamation of sale for recovering individual tax liabilities of partners from a partnership firm&#039;s property. The court held that the income-tax authorities had jurisdiction to realize the partners&#039; tax dues through the firm&#039;s assets. Emphasizing the ongoing appeals process before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, the court ruled that the recovery steps were lawful and denied the petitioner&#039;s claim for court intervention. The judgment discharged the rule, vacated interim orders, and did not award costs, highlighting the importance of following legal procedures and seeking remedies through the established appellate system.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:44:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (12) TMI 16 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23132</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta dismissed a writ petition challenging the proclamation of sale for recovering individual tax liabilities of partners from a partnership firm&#039;s property. The court held that the income-tax authorities had jurisdiction to realize the partners&#039; tax dues through the firm&#039;s assets. Emphasizing the ongoing appeals process before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, the court ruled that the recovery steps were lawful and denied the petitioner&#039;s claim for court intervention. The judgment discharged the rule, vacated interim orders, and did not award costs, highlighting the importance of following legal procedures and seeking remedies through the established appellate system.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>