<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1819 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289998</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appellant&#039;s appeals, recognizing the right to carry forward unabsorbed depreciation, investment allowance, and 80J exemption despite the belated filing of returns. The court distinguished these allowances from business losses and emphasized the duty of tax authorities to assist taxpayers in claiming due reliefs. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration and appropriate action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 09:23:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1819 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289998</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appellant&#039;s appeals, recognizing the right to carry forward unabsorbed depreciation, investment allowance, and 80J exemption despite the belated filing of returns. The court distinguished these allowances from business losses and emphasized the duty of tax authorities to assist taxpayers in claiming due reliefs. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration and appropriate action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>