https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397957 A bail condition under the Haryana GST framework requiring deposit of the alleged tax liability was treated as a recovery measure rather than a legitimate condition securing appearance. The court noted that the statute already provides separate mechanisms for arrest, prosecution, adjudication, interest, penalty and provisional attachment, so revenue protection did not justify compelling payment of a disputed amount at the bail stage. After investigation was complete and the complaint filed, the condition was found unreasonable and contrary to Article 21 personal liberty. The payment condition was set aside and the bond requirement was modified to a lower amount with one surety in immoveable property. en-us Fri, 21 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Mar 2025 18:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397957 A bail condition under the Haryana GST framework requiring deposit of the alleged tax liability was treated as a recovery measure rather than a legitimate condition securing appearance. The court noted that the statute already provides separate mechanisms for arrest, prosecution, adjudication, interest, penalty and provisional attachment, so revenue protection did not justify compelling payment of a disputed amount at the bail stage. After investigation was complete and the complaint filed, the condition was found unreasonable and contrary to Article 21 personal liberty. The payment condition was set aside and the bond requirement was modified to a lower amount with one surety in immoveable property. Case-Laws GST Fri, 21 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397957