<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Expenditure Liability Accrued in 2012-13, Not 2013-14; Additions by Assessing Officer Upheld After Agreement Analysis.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54582</link>
    <description>Accrual of expenditure liability - correct year of assessment - On perusal of the order of AO who has given the detailed finding that why the above liability did not accrue in assessment year 13-14 but in assessment year 12-13, based on the appreciation of the agreement shown by the assessee cannot be found fault with - Additions confirmed - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2020 12:57:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2020 12:57:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Expenditure Liability Accrued in 2012-13, Not 2013-14; Additions by Assessing Officer Upheld After Agreement Analysis.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54582</link>
      <description>Accrual of expenditure liability - correct year of assessment - On perusal of the order of AO who has given the detailed finding that why the above liability did not accrue in assessment year 13-14 but in assessment year 12-13, based on the appreciation of the agreement shown by the assessee cannot be found fault with - Additions confirmed - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2020 12:57:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>