<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Penalty Order Valid: Defective Notice u/s 271(1)(c) Clarified During Penalty Process, No Assessee Prejudice Found.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54580</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - Even where it is held that the charge is uncertain at the initiation stage, the same has been made definite while passing the penalty order, therefore, it is not a case of lack of opportunity to the assessee as well as lack of application of mind on the part of the Assessing officer. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2020 12:14:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2020 12:14:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Penalty Order Valid: Defective Notice u/s 271(1)(c) Clarified During Penalty Process, No Assessee Prejudice Found.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54580</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - Even where it is held that the charge is uncertain at the initiation stage, the same has been made definite while passing the penalty order, therefore, it is not a case of lack of opportunity to the assessee as well as lack of application of mind on the part of the Assessing officer. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2020 12:14:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>