<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 45 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397926</link>
    <description>Classification of transactions as works contract or sale depended on examination of the contracts, invoices and supporting material, and no such material had been placed before the assessing authority to establish a works contract. The HC held that this factual enquiry could not be undertaken in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and that the petitioner should pursue the statutory appellate remedy. The Court therefore declined interference with the rectification order and did not express any view on the merits of the classification dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2020 10:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 45 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397926</link>
      <description>Classification of transactions as works contract or sale depended on examination of the contracts, invoices and supporting material, and no such material had been placed before the assessing authority to establish a works contract. The HC held that this factual enquiry could not be undertaken in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and that the petitioner should pursue the statutory appellate remedy. The Court therefore declined interference with the rectification order and did not express any view on the merits of the classification dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>