<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1869 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289975</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit taken on inputs could not be added to the assessable value under section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, because duty paid on inputs, once taken as credit, does not form part of the input cost for valuation. On refund, the assessee established through Chartered Accountant and Indian Railway certificates that the duty incidence had not been passed on to the buyer, so the claim was not barred by unjust enrichment. The finding was in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2020 00:23:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1869 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289975</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit taken on inputs could not be added to the assessable value under section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, because duty paid on inputs, once taken as credit, does not form part of the input cost for valuation. On refund, the assessee established through Chartered Accountant and Indian Railway certificates that the duty incidence had not been passed on to the buyer, so the claim was not barred by unjust enrichment. The finding was in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>