<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Rent paid to URD for commercial property taken on rent basis</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=116687</link>
    <description>Section 9(4) originally placed reverse charge liability on registered recipients for supplies from unregistered suppliers, but subsequent notifications and statutory amendment confined liability to those classes of registered persons and specified supplies that the Government has expressly notified; consequently reverse charge under Section 9(4) now arises only where a person and supply category have been so notified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2020 19:53:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:54:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Rent paid to URD for commercial property taken on rent basis</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=116687</link>
      <description>Section 9(4) originally placed reverse charge liability on registered recipients for supplies from unregistered suppliers, but subsequent notifications and statutory amendment confined liability to those classes of registered persons and specified supplies that the Government has expressly notified; consequently reverse charge under Section 9(4) now arises only where a person and supply category have been so notified.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2020 19:53:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=116687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>