https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397923 The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the seizure of cash under Section 67(2) of the CGST Act, 2017. It found that the authorities had the power to seize money under the broad interpretation of "things" in the Act. The court rejected claims of constitutional violations, affirmed the admissibility of confessional statements, and ruled that the petitioner lacked standing to challenge the seizure. Emphasizing the need for the investigation to proceed, the court determined that the seized amount should not be released until final adjudication, ensuring compliance with statutory provisions and legal principles. en-us Wed, 26 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Mar 2025 18:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397923 The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the seizure of cash under Section 67(2) of the CGST Act, 2017. It found that the authorities had the power to seize money under the broad interpretation of "things" in the Act. The court rejected claims of constitutional violations, affirmed the admissibility of confessional statements, and ruled that the petitioner lacked standing to challenge the seizure. Emphasizing the need for the investigation to proceed, the court determined that the seized amount should not be released until final adjudication, ensuring compliance with statutory provisions and legal principles. Case-Laws GST Wed, 26 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397923