<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 34 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397915</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing the deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for interest income from investments with cooperative banks. The revenue&#039;s appeal to set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and restore the AO&#039;s decision was dismissed. The Tribunal found no grounds for interference, affirming the correctness of the CIT(A)&#039;s interpretation based on legal provisions and precedents. The decision was rendered on 28/08/2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2020 13:56:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 34 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397915</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing the deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for interest income from investments with cooperative banks. The revenue&#039;s appeal to set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and restore the AO&#039;s decision was dismissed. The Tribunal found no grounds for interference, affirming the correctness of the CIT(A)&#039;s interpretation based on legal provisions and precedents. The decision was rendered on 28/08/2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>