<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 27 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397908</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not sustainable as there was no concealment in the return of income filed in response to the notice under Section 148. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the principle that penalty cannot be imposed unless there is actual concealment or non-disclosure in the income tax return. Other appeals with similar issues were also allowed based on this reasoning.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2020 13:36:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 27 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397908</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not sustainable as there was no concealment in the return of income filed in response to the notice under Section 148. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the principle that penalty cannot be imposed unless there is actual concealment or non-disclosure in the income tax return. Other appeals with similar issues were also allowed based on this reasoning.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>