<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 26 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397907</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under section 271(1)(c) based on undisclosed sales, emphasizing accurate income reporting. The appeal was allowed after condoning the delay in filing, with directions to reassess the penalty based on reduced additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2020 13:33:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 26 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397907</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under section 271(1)(c) based on undisclosed sales, emphasizing accurate income reporting. The appeal was allowed after condoning the delay in filing, with directions to reassess the penalty based on reduced additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>