<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 20 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397901</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside additions made by the AO and Ld. CIT(A) regarding unexplained bank deposits and unexplained investment in a flat. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to sufficient cause shown by the assessee, and the matter was disposed of on merit. The ITAT accepted the explanations provided by the assessee, directing the AO to verify the issues again based on the evidence presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2020 13:28:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 20 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397901</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside additions made by the AO and Ld. CIT(A) regarding unexplained bank deposits and unexplained investment in a flat. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to sufficient cause shown by the assessee, and the matter was disposed of on merit. The ITAT accepted the explanations provided by the assessee, directing the AO to verify the issues again based on the evidence presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>