https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397898 The High Court's inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC can still be invoked to prevent abuse of process and secure justice, even where a further revision is barred by Section 397(3); the challenge was treated as one under residual inherent power and held maintainable. On travel abroad, the Court required verified exceptional grounds and adequate safeguards: the first petitioner was allowed limited travel on a time-bound basis because a medical emergency concerning her minor son was supported by authenticated diplomatic communications, while the second petitioner was denied relief for want of urgency. Security deposit and an undertaking to return were treated as sufficient safeguards for the limited permission granted. en-us Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Mar 2021 10:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397898 The High Court's inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC can still be invoked to prevent abuse of process and secure justice, even where a further revision is barred by Section 397(3); the challenge was treated as one under residual inherent power and held maintainable. On travel abroad, the Court required verified exceptional grounds and adequate safeguards: the first petitioner was allowed limited travel on a time-bound basis because a medical emergency concerning her minor son was supported by authenticated diplomatic communications, while the second petitioner was denied relief for want of urgency. Security deposit and an undertaking to return were treated as sufficient safeguards for the limited permission granted. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397898