https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289947 The appeal was allowed, and the matter was remanded to the Competition Commission of India (CCI) for directing an investigation under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002. The Tribunal determined that the CCI had erred by evaluating the merits of the allegations instead of solely assessing whether a prima facie case existed. It was emphasized that the CCI should not confuse the formation of a prima facie opinion with the final determination of issues. The Tribunal directed that the investigation should proceed without being influenced by its order, and the CCI must issue an appropriate order based on the Director General's report. en-us Thu, 26 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Nov 2021 14:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289947 The appeal was allowed, and the matter was remanded to the Competition Commission of India (CCI) for directing an investigation under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002. The Tribunal determined that the CCI had erred by evaluating the merits of the allegations instead of solely assessing whether a prima facie case existed. It was emphasized that the CCI should not confuse the formation of a prima facie opinion with the final determination of issues. The Tribunal directed that the investigation should proceed without being influenced by its order, and the CCI must issue an appropriate order based on the Director General's report. Case-Laws Law of Competition Thu, 26 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289947