<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 815 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397872</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal for A.Y. 2012-13 and partly allowed the appeal for A.Y. 2013-14. The Tribunal directed the TPO to include FOREX Fluctuation as operating income and excluded KPO service providers from comparables. Interest under section 234C was to be charged on returned income, and the disallowed computer depreciation was upheld. The Stay Application for A.Y. 2012-13 became moot.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 815 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397872</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal for A.Y. 2012-13 and partly allowed the appeal for A.Y. 2013-14. The Tribunal directed the TPO to include FOREX Fluctuation as operating income and excluded KPO service providers from comparables. Interest under section 234C was to be charged on returned income, and the disallowed computer depreciation was upheld. The Stay Application for A.Y. 2012-13 became moot.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>