<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 812 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397869</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction of Rs. 3,38,00,000 towards payment made to Mumbai Port Trust under Section 23 of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify the allowability of interest paid to BPT under Section 24. The delay in pronouncement of the order was justified due to the COVID-19 lockdown, with the Tribunal excluding the lockdown period from the 90-day limit for order pronouncement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 18:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 812 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397869</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction of Rs. 3,38,00,000 towards payment made to Mumbai Port Trust under Section 23 of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify the allowability of interest paid to BPT under Section 24. The delay in pronouncement of the order was justified due to the COVID-19 lockdown, with the Tribunal excluding the lockdown period from the 90-day limit for order pronouncement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>