<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 806 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397863</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing comparability requires functional similarity and reliable period alignment: Alphageo (seismic data services) and TCG Lifesciences (contract research) were functionally different from technical support services, and Pfizer&#039;s November year-end data was not comparable with a March year-end basis, so the corresponding adjustment was deleted. Back-office support services were treated as requiring the same fresh adjudication already ordered in the assessee&#039;s earlier year, so that matter was restored to the Assessing Officer/TPO. For withholding tax, global support service fees paid to a Singapore entity were not fees for technical services because the services did not satisfy the &quot;make available&quot; test, so the section 40(a)(i) disallowance was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 18:24:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 806 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397863</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing comparability requires functional similarity and reliable period alignment: Alphageo (seismic data services) and TCG Lifesciences (contract research) were functionally different from technical support services, and Pfizer&#039;s November year-end data was not comparable with a March year-end basis, so the corresponding adjustment was deleted. Back-office support services were treated as requiring the same fresh adjudication already ordered in the assessee&#039;s earlier year, so that matter was restored to the Assessing Officer/TPO. For withholding tax, global support service fees paid to a Singapore entity were not fees for technical services because the services did not satisfy the &quot;make available&quot; test, so the section 40(a)(i) disallowance was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>