https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397851 The court dismissed the petition challenging the Registrar of Companies' decision to strike off the company's name from the Register of Companies due to lack of territorial jurisdiction. The court emphasized that the cause of action arose from the ROC's action in Chennai, not the Central Government's direction for an SFIO investigation in Delhi. The decision highlights the significance of actions forming the cause of action falling within the court's jurisdiction for it to entertain such petitions, granting the petitioner the liberty to approach the appropriate forum without expressing an opinion on the case's merits. en-us Thu, 27 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Aug 2020 17:26:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397851 The court dismissed the petition challenging the Registrar of Companies' decision to strike off the company's name from the Register of Companies due to lack of territorial jurisdiction. The court emphasized that the cause of action arose from the ROC's action in Chennai, not the Central Government's direction for an SFIO investigation in Delhi. The decision highlights the significance of actions forming the cause of action falling within the court's jurisdiction for it to entertain such petitions, granting the petitioner the liberty to approach the appropriate forum without expressing an opinion on the case's merits. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 27 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397851