<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1313 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289917</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to determine the arm&#039;s length price afresh, considering the observations made regarding the selection/rejection of comparables and the application of the RPT filter. All other grounds not specifically argued were deemed not pressed and dismissed. The appeal was partly allowed, and the order was pronounced in open court on 18.10.2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 18:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1313 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289917</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to determine the arm&#039;s length price afresh, considering the observations made regarding the selection/rejection of comparables and the application of the RPT filter. All other grounds not specifically argued were deemed not pressed and dismissed. The appeal was partly allowed, and the order was pronounced in open court on 18.10.2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>