https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289927 The Tribunal upheld the dropping of the demand related to excess electricity consumption as the Department did not object to it. However, the order regarding the alleged clandestine removal of manufactured MS Ingots was set aside due to lack of corroborative evidence. The reliance on third-party evidence without tangible proof was deemed insufficient to confirm the demand, leading to the dismissal of penalties on the Director of the company. en-us Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 30 Aug 2020 13:28:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289927 The Tribunal upheld the dropping of the demand related to excess electricity consumption as the Department did not object to it. However, the order regarding the alleged clandestine removal of manufactured MS Ingots was set aside due to lack of corroborative evidence. The reliance on third-party evidence without tangible proof was deemed insufficient to confirm the demand, leading to the dismissal of penalties on the Director of the company. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289927