<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1323 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289930</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal as the Appellant did not meet the criteria of an Operational Creditor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Appellant had not provided goods or services, nor was an employee of the Corporate Debtor or a Government Authority. Despite a 14-day delay in filing the appeal, it was condoned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2020 13:28:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1323 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289930</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal as the Appellant did not meet the criteria of an Operational Creditor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Appellant had not provided goods or services, nor was an employee of the Corporate Debtor or a Government Authority. Despite a 14-day delay in filing the appeal, it was condoned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=289930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>