<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Profiteering Allegations in Film Admission Services Confirmed; DGAP&#039;s Methodology Valid u/s 171(1) of the Tax Law.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54542</link>
    <description>Profiteering - supply of “Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematograph films” - allegation that the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax not passed on by way of commensurate reduction in price - The mathematical methodology employed by the DGAP to compute the profiteered amount is correct, appropriate, reasonable and in consonance with the provisions of Section 171(1) - NAPA</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2020 20:46:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2020 20:46:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Profiteering Allegations in Film Admission Services Confirmed; DGAP&#039;s Methodology Valid u/s 171(1) of the Tax Law.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54542</link>
      <description>Profiteering - supply of “Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematograph films” - allegation that the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax not passed on by way of commensurate reduction in price - The mathematical methodology employed by the DGAP to compute the profiteered amount is correct, appropriate, reasonable and in consonance with the provisions of Section 171(1) - NAPA</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2020 20:46:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>