<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 768 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397825</link>
    <description>The HC of Karnataka dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the ITAT&#039;s decision to allow the provision for warranty as a deduction. The Tribunal found the provision was made according to accounting standards and based on scientific estimation, fulfilling the conditions set by the SC. The revenue&#039;s argument against the allowance was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 768 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397825</link>
      <description>The HC of Karnataka dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the ITAT&#039;s decision to allow the provision for warranty as a deduction. The Tribunal found the provision was made according to accounting standards and based on scientific estimation, fulfilling the conditions set by the SC. The revenue&#039;s argument against the allowance was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>