<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 766 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397823</link>
    <description>The court upheld the capital expenditure classification for the development expenses incurred by the assessee for Sucralose, emphasizing the enduring benefits derived from the new product. The court&#039;s analysis aligned with legal principles dictating the treatment of expenditure based on its purpose and impact on the business, ultimately dismissing the appeal and ruling in favor of the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 766 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397823</link>
      <description>The court upheld the capital expenditure classification for the development expenses incurred by the assessee for Sucralose, emphasizing the enduring benefits derived from the new product. The court&#039;s analysis aligned with legal principles dictating the treatment of expenditure based on its purpose and impact on the business, ultimately dismissing the appeal and ruling in favor of the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>