<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 747 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397804</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the assessee&#039;s Miscellaneous Application under section 254(2), seeking rectification of its prior order dated 28/10/2019. The Tribunal concluded that the alleged mistakes were not apparent from the record and emphasized its limited power to rectify, not review, its decisions. It found the discrepancies in the figures provided by the assessee unreliable and affirmed that the explanations and submissions were duly considered. The order was pronounced on 20/03/2020, upholding the original decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=620946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 747 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397804</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the assessee&#039;s Miscellaneous Application under section 254(2), seeking rectification of its prior order dated 28/10/2019. The Tribunal concluded that the alleged mistakes were not apparent from the record and emphasized its limited power to rectify, not review, its decisions. It found the discrepancies in the figures provided by the assessee unreliable and affirmed that the explanations and submissions were duly considered. The order was pronounced on 20/03/2020, upholding the original decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=397804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>